In reference to changing locations: Our biologist in Edmonton says, that in Edmonton, we have a hierarchy of locations.
Bell seems to be prime
U of A -next
Weber - next
then we have 3 or 4 more locations.
when peregrines come back from migration they come back to their spot if possible, but then go cruising. If it appears a spot has opened in a more prime location , they will try and move in, and keep it, which would leave their site open. ( I am simplifying this the best I can) . We have had this happen.
Of course, some do not make it back from migration , and so there is an opening at their site, or they come back a bit later and a new peregrine is there.
Then they have to fight o get it back. This happened at WEber last year. Miss Edmonton always returns late and there was a new female there. when Miss Edmonton returned, It was not much of a an altercation. MIss Edmonton prevailed. But then in 2007 MIss Edmonton lost her prime spot at U of A( in a nasty battle) and went to WEber , and has been there ever since.
so Roger may just not be around right now. OUr biologist says, it is mostly the males that will return to an area where they were raised( we know there is always exceptions). That is why when he hacks juveniles along the Pembina, he likes to use mostly males as they are most likely to return. Females tend to nest further away. For example, RAdisson at U of A, Edmonton, is from Winnipeg site( princess and Trey are her parents) . But Ivy, (Trey and Princess's son ) took over Winnipeg site , when Trey did not return. Previously , Trey took over the site , when his dad did not return.
Is this as clear as mud
our biologist says it does not harm the offspring.
hope this helps
my fingers are crossed for Roger , but want no harm to come to anyone.