westwindschild wrote:
. . . . I am certain I read in some of the material that was linked to the forum that there is no evidence that falcons have ever nested in the area where they are hacking, or anywhere along the New River Gorge, even before they were exterminated in the east. So they are essentially trying to force them into habitat that for some reason they have always avoided. Number one: any idea why they wouldn't have nested there before?Number two: Wouldn't it disrupt the existing natural balance to introduce a new predator to the area?
Although I agree with most people posting here that it was a mistake to send the Wilmington girls to West Virginia, I expect that the New River Gorge is very much like Appalachian cliffs historically used by peregrines, even if there are no records of them there. I hope that the hacking project succeeds but that they stick to their announced procedure of using nestlings from dangerous bridge sites.
Some people would argue that your natural balance point is better made in connection with establishing peregrines on nesting platforms in coastal marshes, which certainly subjects shorebirds to intense predation they did not encounter when the falcons bred only on cliffs. I've heard some grumbling about this from people who like the shorebirds.
There are tradeoffs even in cities. The peregrines here in Wilmington catch nighthawks on migration. I doubt that you could have breeding nighthawks in a city with breeding peregrines. I'm delighted that we have the peregrines here, though.